• Disclaimer

    The Runoff Area is a website devoted to the purposes of humour and satire, not a serious motorsports news publication. When reading articles on this website - even you credulous folks over at ApexSpeed - please try to understand that they are not intended to be taken seriously. Sebastian Vettel is not a baby, I know of no plans to host a Grand Prix in South Ossetia, and Kimi Raikkonen doesn't respond to everything with a "bemused grunt." Or does he?
  • Legal Bit

    The text content of all posts from The Runoff Area are the intellectual property of Red Andy. You can share the jokes with your friends if you like, but please provide a link to the original. Images used on this website are not the property of The Runoff Area, and thus, where possible, a link is provided to the original image. If you own an image that is used on this site and would like it removed, please contact the webmaster.

Donnelly reprimand for attempt to fix court decision

Paris, Monday: F1’s chief steward Alan Donnelly has been formally reprimanded by the FIA for attempting to unfairly influence the outcome of the Court of Appeal’s decision on Renault’s Valencia penalty, being heard today in Paris.

Accused: F1 steward Alan Donnelly

Accused: F1 steward Alan Donnelly

Renault were given a one race ban for releasing Fernando Alonso from the pits without having properly attached one of his wheels. They have appealed the decision and a final judgement from the FIA’s Court of Appeal is expected to be announced later today or tomorrow.

However Donnelly, who as a member of the stewarding team is participating as an interested party in the hearing, has been accused of trying to interfere with the processes of the court in order to see his original decision vindicated.

Since 2006, cases in the FIA Court of Appeal have been decided by coin toss, instead of through the more thorough but also more tedious process of hearing evidence, weighing up the arguments of both sides and coming to a reasoned conclusion based on the regulations.

Donnelly apparently attempted to replace the Court of Appeal’s ceremonial coin with an almost identical replica, which featured two “head” sides instead of the more usual pattern of one head and one tail. Since heads traditionally means that the original decision will be upheld, Donnelly hoped that this coin would mean for certain that the court would be bound to agree with him.

“This is not so much a miscarriage of justice as it is an abortion of justice,” FIA President Max Mosley said in unnecessarily graphic terms. “And while administering random decisions with little or no attention paid to actual justice is a hallmark of the Court of Appeal, it is a fundamental aim of the FIA that such decisions are indeed random, not influenced by any outside party. Except Ferrari, of course.”

Advertisements

One Response

  1. LOL, that’s a good one!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: